Table of Contents
Abstract: This study investigates the influence of Syriac on Christian Middle Arabic in Mount Lebanon between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries through a linguistic analysis of Maronite council records, Druze religious writings, and commercial documents. By examining features such as definiteness, dual forms, relative pronouns, and negation, the author identifies grammatical patterns that reflect continued Syriac or Aramaic influence in early Christian Arabic texts. The comparison with later religious and secular writings demonstrates a gradual mastery of Classical Arabic and the diminishing visibility of these substratum effects by the eighteenth century. The article argues that linguistic change in Ottoman Lebanon was a dynamic process shaped by education, social interaction, and cultural continuity rather than by fixed ethnic or ideological identities.
Abstract: This study explores the miracle of Christ walking on water through the Syriac exegesis of Ephrem the Syrian and Dionysius bar Salibi, comparing their interpretations with the hagiographical account of Mar Awgīn. Rather than treating the narrative primarily as a demonstration of power over nature, the article argues that Syriac tradition understands it as an epiphany revealing Christ’s divine identity and inviting a deeper response of faith. The comparison shows that Ephrem emphasizes Christological and apologetic concerns, while Dionysius focuses on personal trust and proximity to God. By reading Mar Awgīn’s miracle in light of these exegetical traditions, the study highlights its theological, spiritual, and apologetic dimensions, presenting the saint as an imitator of Christ whose holiness strengthens faith and hope.
Abstract: This study examines St Ephrem the Syrian as an exegete whose biblical hermeneutics embody a deliberate plurality of interpretive methods. Ephrem views Scripture as intrinsically complex, containing both material words and hidden meanings that require complementary “factual” and “spiritual” readings. His prose commentaries privilege historical clarity, while his hymns and metrical homilies cultivate theological and symbolic insight. Ephrem justifies this multiplicity through two images: Scripture as an inexhaustible spring, whose meanings cannot be exhausted, and as a mirror, reflecting the diverse conditions of its readers. Parallels with Aphrahat demonstrate that such hermeneutical fecundity is foundational to early Syriac exegesis, offering a dynamic model for contemporary biblical interpretation.
TAMCKE, Martin “Ephrem and the Lutherans”, SOPJ 55 (2017), 51-62.
Abstract: The article traces the reception of St Ephrem the Syrian within Lutheran scholarship from the Reformation to the modern era. It highlights how Lutheran theologians—such as August Hahn, Caesar von Lengerke, and later scholars in Göttingen—engaged Ephrem’s writings for doctrinal, historical, and spiritual purposes. Particular attention is given to debates over Ephrem’s Eucharistic theology, where Lutheran and Catholic interpreters contested his understanding of Christ’s presence in the sacrament. The study shows that Lutheran interest in Ephrem consistently combined philological rigor, theological reflection, and devotional sensitivity. It concludes that Ephrem’s poetic and symbolic theology has served as a bridge across confessional boundaries, enriching Lutheran thought while revealing the challenges of denominational interpretation.
Abstract: The article examines the Syriac sources underlying the Psautier spirituel, a 19th‑century Russian compilation of 150 prayers attributed to Ephrem the Syrian by Bishop Theophane the Recluse. It analyzes the structure of the collection, its dependence on the Greek and Slavonic “Ephrem,” and the complex issue of authenticity within the Greek Ephrem corpus. The study highlights theological anachronisms—such as Chalcedonian formulas and Byzantine Marian titles—absent from genuine Syriac Ephrem. By comparing the prayers with Syriac liturgical and ascetical texts, especially the Šbiṯo and various madrošē, the author identifies numerous Syriac parallels. The findings demonstrate that the Psautier spirituel reflects a broader Syriac–Byzantine exchange rather than authentic Ephremic authorship.
Ecumenical Report
Book Reviews
المجلة البطريركية (الإصدار الجديد) 55، 2017
المحتويات
[Traduction arabe par Cyrill Babi de : Louis Leloir, Doctrines et méthodes de S. Éphrem d’après son Commentaire de l’Évangile concordant (original syriaque et version arménienne), CSCO 220, Subsidia 18, Louvain : Secrétariat du CorpusCSO, 1961, p. VIII-72, SOPJ 55 (2017), 1-75 (arabe)]
Abstract: This study examines Ephrem the Syrian’s doctrinal and methodological approach through his Commentary on the Diatessaron, using both the Syriac original and the Armenian translation. The discovery of the Chester Beatty Syriac manuscript provides a direct witness that complements the more complete Armenian version, enabling a more accurate reconstruction of Ephrem’s exegetical principles. The analysis highlights Ephrem’s integration of biblical interpretation, theological reflection, and spiritual pedagogy, emphasizing his distinctive synthesis of Semitic thought and early Christian tradition. By comparing both textual traditions, the study identifies consistent thematic structures, clarifies Ephrem’s hermeneutical strategies, and outlines the broader implications for understanding early Syriac Christianity and the transmission of gospel harmonies in Late Antiquity.
[Al-Khoury, Youhanna Yeshu‘, « Les aspects du sacerdoce selon saint Éphrem le Syrien », SOPJ 55 (2017), 77-100 (arabe)]
Abstract: This article presents Saint Ephrem’s conception of the priesthood in four stages: 1) the priesthood of Melchizedek among the nations (HRes I, 12; HNat I, 25; HAzy II, 8; HV VIII, 18, 20–21); 2) the priesthood of Aaron among the Hebrews (CN2, XLVIII, 1; HV VIII, 9–10; HAzy II, 5–7); 3) the priesthood of Christ in the world (HcH XXII, 19; EC IV, 3; HAzy VI, 11–14; HCru IV, 12); and 4) the priesthood of the Church, as illustrated by the four bishops of Nisibis, who were contemporaries of the Syrian doctor (CN1, XIII–XXI).
[Al-Shamani, Barnaba, “Messiah or Christ according to Jewish and Christian thought”, SOPJ 55 (2017), 101-129 (Arabic)]
Abstract: In our reading of the Old Testament books, we find prophets chosen by God anointing those selected before Him to perform special tasks assigned to them. Those who were anointed would be called the ‘Messiah of the Lord’, for these chosen were devoted exclusively to the work of the Lord; they would fulfill God’s will with obedience and have an intimate relationship with him. On the other hand, the anointing had the power to make the anointed persons (whether they were priests, kings or prophets), special among the people of God, because each one of them became a Messiah of the Lord.
In the New Testament, the title of Messiah or Christ was associated with Jesus the Nazarene only. This is in contrast with the Old Testament’s use of the term, which included many people and not one specific person. Although many in the New Testament were assigned tasks from heaven, none of them were called Christ except Jesus. The reason for this is that Jesus holds three functions together in his person (priest, king, and prophet), in addition to being chosen by God the Father, so that he might fulfill the task.
التقرير المسكوني
اللقاء الرابع عشر للّجنة المشتركة للحوار اللاهوتيّ بين الكنيسة الكاثوليكيّة والكنائس الأرثوذكسيّة الشرقيّة، المجلة البطريركية (الإصدار الجديد) 55 (2017)، ص 131-1
اللقاء الخامس للحوار الرسميّ بين الكنائس الأرثوذكسية الشرقية والكنيسة الأنكليكانية، المجلة البطريركية (الإصدار الجديد) 55 (2017)، ص 134.